After spending time with Chase Kloetzke and learning about admissibility. I need to look at this skull without all of the hype of proving that this skull was in any way connected to Aliens.
Now I have to look at what Lloyd did with all the experts that he discounted. He took the skull to numerous Anthropologist, Pediatricians, Cranial Surgeons, Archeologists, Neurologists and many others. According to Lloyd they all dismissed the skull as hydrocephalic and cradle boarded. Then they said nature can do anything and Occam's razor theory: The simplest explanation is usually right.
So now I need look at the 24 differences that the original Starchild Project Team noted and came up their explanations, which I originally believed. Let’s consider that every expert (including the experts that Lloyd found) say: the teeth where that of a 5-year-old child and the experts that say the skull is a result of hydrocephalus.
The Starchild Project Team always compared the Starchild Skull to the Companion Skull. This is like comparing apples to oranges: a 5 year old deformed skull to a normal adult skull.
Biochemical signature is much richer in collagen. There is no report that I have seen that backs up this conclusion. The SEM test done at Selee labs did not find the same results.
Bone is uniformly ½ as thick as normal human. When we went to the Osteology Museum in Oklahoma we saw that the Starchild Skull is the same thickness as that of other skulls between the ages of 5-9 years old.
The Starchild Skull weighs ½ as much as normal human skull of comparable in size. The Starchild Skull weighs the same at other skulls between the ages of 5-9 years old.
Surface of the normal human bone is covered with tiny little holes called lacunae, yet SC has none. Looking at the actual pictures there are lacunae just not as many. This could be due to the fact it is only 5 years old and it has been varnished.
SC has microscopic fibers never before seen in any other bone. Selee labs did not find any fibers. The Starchild Project Team also did another SEM at the University of Florida and no fibers were found. Notice that this was dismissed by the Starchild Project.
SC has red residue in the tiny spaces where bone marrow normally forms. Selee labs did not find any residue. The Starchild Project Team also did another SEM at the University of Florida and no residue was found.
Lower face is much smaller: This could be due to Hydrocephaly
SC has no brow ridges: This could be due to Hydrocephaly
Eye sockets unusually shaped & only 0.7 inches at it max.; while the depth of a normal human’s is 2 in. deep. Again, apples to oranges. Bones around the eye sockets have been broken off so we really don’t know just how deep the eye socket really is.
The roof of the mouth is flat. Unable to do analysis because when I finally got the maxilla back, it was missing the roof of the mouth.
Check bones are smaller making the chewing muscles to be much smaller. Again, apples to oranges. This is normal for a child.
Chewing muscles cover ½ as much surface space as normal human. Again, apples to oranges. This is normal for a child.
Ears holes lower. Low ears can be due to many congenital defects such as, Trisomy 13, Trisomy 15, and Downs Syndrome
Inner ear is twice the size as normal human. This is common in Downs Syndrome
Neck muscles ½ the size as normal human. Apples to oranges; you would expect a child to have small muscles than that of an adults muscles. If the child was bedridden than it would make since the neck muscles would have atrophied.
No external occipital protuberance (inion). We have the people at the Osteology Museum saying the inion has just migrated down because the child was bedridden but, after Dr. Judkins examination he agrees that there is no inion.
SC does have internal occipital protuberance yet it is much smaller. Again, apples to oranges. This is normal for a child.
Rear of the head is widely expanded & flattened not as a result of cradle boarding. This is completely possible. But this does not by any means that the Starchild is an alien. This could be due to the child being bedridden not cradle boarded. Also today many of today’s children have flat head syndrome because babies are being left of their backs and not turned from side to side.
There is a noticeable crease to the rear sagittal suture where it meets the lambdoidial suture. This can be seen in other hydrocephalic skulls and children today.
The brain capacity of the SC is 1600 cc. while normal adult human is 1400 cc and a child is 1200 cc. This does not mean that is full on solid tissue, it could be full of liquid i.e. Hydrocephaly.
SC has 2 rows teeth like that of a child yet are worn & ground to a degree that seems impossible to be that of a child. Despite the fact that all the experts say that this is a 5 year old based on the teeth. The wear on the teeth has not been verified by a dentist. Even I was convinced that the teeth x-ray showed multiple rows of teeth then I found this picture.
The Starchild has no frontal sinuses. We have to have to remember that the Starchild was buried and the bone of a child is softer and thinner so it makes sense that the sinuses would decay.
The bone is so hard that it required a diamond bit drill blade to cut. Again we can’t compare the two skulls. The Starchild was buried in soil full of minerals and metals; so there would be a displacement of minerals with silicon which will increase the density.